Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kane v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1894PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Mandamus. (1) The position taken by the respondent is that . the increase in the relator’s salary made by the ordinance of 1893 is void because it is prohibited by section 8 of article 14 of the constitution of this state.

Read the full summary

Mandamus. (1) The position taken by the respondent is that . the increase in the relator’s salary made by the ordinance of 1893 is void because it is prohibited by section 8 of article 14 of the constitution of this state. That section reads as follows: “The compensation or fees of nó state, county, or municipal officer shall be increased during his term of office; nor shall the term of any office be extended for a longer period than that .for which such officer was elected or appointed.” (2) It is, of course, conceded that the relator is a public officer in the meaning of the general…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

— On January 15, 1894, an alternative writ of mandamus issued in this cause against respondent, comptroller of St. Joseph, wherein it is alleged that “St. Joseph has been a city of the second class since April, 1885; that respondent is the comptroller of said city, and O. M. Gilmer, auditor; that the city has established a fire department, pursuant to the authority of the general law, which consists of a chief engineer, and assistant chief and sufficient men to man and operate the fire engines and other machinery and apparatus used for extinguishment of fires; that relator was appointed, by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Throop v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Denison v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Strong v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Stadler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gratiot County State Bank v. Johnson Ex Rel. St. Louis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API