Legal Opinion
Liberman v. McDonnell
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1929No. Docket No. 6692PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An action to recover the price agreed to be paid for 200 shares of the stock of the Southern States Oil Company, a corporation, which were sold by defendants on the New York Curb market.
The defendants, namely, James F. McDonnell, Hubert McDonnell, Robert E. McDonnell, Harold L. Mack, Robert M. Ridley, Gilbert W. Cullen, and W. P. O’Connor, are co-partners doing a stock brokerage business under the name of McDonnell & Co., with offices in San Francisco and New York, the firm being an associate member of the New York Curb market. According to a stipulation filed by the parties, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Tuckerman v. MearnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
- Hadfield v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Northrup v. ShookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herbert Tepper v. Frank H. Chichester, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Bennett-Manning Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Black v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hutchinson v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- Griffin v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Meadows v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.