Black v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.
The principal elements of this appeal are the duty of a stock broker, owed to his customers who purchase the securities of a corporation, to disclose to them material facts known to him concerning the corporation; the duty of a director of the corporation, owed to it, not to disclose the same facts if he acquired knowledge of them as a director; and the consequences which may arise when the broker and the director are the same person.
Appellant Shearson, Hammill & Go. (hereinafter “Shear-son”) is a copartnership engaged in the stock brokerage business. At relevant times, appellant Dunbar was a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Walsh v. Hooker & FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Massei v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Blackburn v. WitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.