Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1933No. Docket No. 823PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plunkett-Lilienthal and Company is a copartnership with its place of business in the city and county of San Francisco, transacting a general brokerage business, and is a member of the San Francisco Stock Exchange. Before the commencement of this action it assigned its demand against Le Roy Payne, now deceased, to respondent for collection.
During the year 1928 Le Roy Payne purchased different stocks through the agency of respondent’s assignor, paying cash for the securities and accepted deliveries of them. In the latter part of the year he had a conversation with one Sidney Clark, an employee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Vista v. Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Krinsky v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.