Legal Opinion

Banta v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. G-. Ewing, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The city of Chicago adopted an ordinance declaring it unlawful for any person, association or corporation to engage in business in the capacity of a “broker” within said city without having paid a license fee and obtained a license authorizing such person, association or corporation to transact business in that capacity. The appellant was tried upon a stipulated state of facts, by the court without a jury, and was convicted of violating said ordinance and a fine of $25 was assessed against him. This is an appeal from such judgment of conviction.

Counsel for appellant urge the court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ThurberIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  2. City of East St. Louis v. WehrungIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. City of Cairo v. BrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Pray v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bessette v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jacobs v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Salt Lake City v. Christensen Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API