Legal Opinion
Hadfield v. Tracy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheelek, C. J.
The ownership in the. stocks purchased by Tracy on a. margin account with Hull Company and by them hypothecated with Clarke and Company and Latham, brokers in New York, under the customary conditions of margin accounts between stock brokers and their customers, is not, under our law, in doubt. Nor is there anything in the corrections of the finding, with a single exception or two, which, if made, could change the result under the rules of law which were announced in Skiff v. Stoddard, 63 Conn. 198, 26 Atl. 874, 28 id. 104, and have since remained the law of this jurisdiction. It is claimed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sexton v. Kessler & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Murphy v. BuonatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Walston & Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Porter v. Mesilla Valley Cotton Products Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Liberman v. McDonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.