Parks v. Security Life & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The rule of practice is well established in this jurisdiction that when a request is made for a specific instruction, correct in itself and supported by evidence, the trial court, while not obliged to adopt the precise language of the prayer, is nevertheless required to give the instruction, in substance at least, and unless this is done, either in direct response to the prayer or otherwise in some portion of the charge, the failure will constitute reversible error. Marcom v. R. R., 165 N. C., 259, 81 S. E., 290; Irvin v. R. R., 164 N. C., 5, 80 S. E., 78; C. S., 565.
A very full and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . DunlopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Waggoner v. Western Carolina Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Baker v. N. & S. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Irvin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Meacham v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.