Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

The principal matter debated on brief is whether the action was commenced within six months from the completion of the project as provided by C. S., 3846 (bb). The question was not mooted in the court below and there is nothing on the record to show whether the action was, or was not, brought within the requisite time. In this state of the record, it would seem that, with justice to all, the question might well be left undecided, as a new trial must be awarded for failure to give tbe special instruction requested by defendant. Tbis will afford botb sides equal opportunity to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meares v. Commissioners of the Town of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  2. Dorsey v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Harper v. Town of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Bost v. Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Jones v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Jenkins v. City of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. HocuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API