Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
The principal matter debated on brief is whether the action was commenced within six months from the completion of the project as provided by C. S., 3846 (bb). The question was not mooted in the court below and there is nothing on the record to show whether the action was, or was not, brought within the requisite time. In this state of the record, it would seem that, with justice to all, the question might well be left undecided, as a new trial must be awarded for failure to give tbe special instruction requested by defendant. Tbis will afford botb sides equal opportunity to be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meares v. Commissioners of the Town of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
- Dorsey v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Harper v. Town of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Bost v. Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Jones v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Jenkins v. City of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. HocuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.