Meacham v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The one circumstance which saves the case from non-suit, Godwin v. R. R., 202 N. C., 1, 161 S. E., 541; Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527, 157 S. E., 800, and carries it to the jury, Dancy v. R. R., 204 N. C., 303, 168 S. E., 200; Butner v. R. R., 199 N. C., 695, 155 S. E., 601, is the presence of evidence tending to show low visibility from fog or mist. Parker v. R. R., 181 N. C., 95, 106 S. E., 755; Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431, 79 S. E., 690; Morrow v. R. R., 146 N. C., 14, 59 S. E., 158. Compare Loflin v. R. R., 210 N. C., 404, 186 S. E., 493; Weston v. R. R., 194 N. C., 210, 139 S. E.,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Caldwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Beaver v. Town of China GroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.