Legal Opinion

Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. Anders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1965No. 114PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the failure of the trial court to allow its motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim. Defendant, having admitted the execution and delivery of the conditional sales contract in suit, must establish the novation he has alleged if plaintiff is not to recover the amount it claims.

To establish the terms of the novation he alleges, defendant relies upon his conversations with Manuel, plaintiff’s sales agent for Western North Carolina. The evidence discloses, however, that Manuel himself had no authority to modify the contractual relations existing between plaintiff and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Gallup v. County of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API