State v. . Henderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.
The defendant, in writing and in apt time, requested the following instruction, to wit: “The court instructs the jury that to convict the defendant it is encumbent upon the State to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the promise to marry was absolute and not conditional upon his securing a divorce or any other condition.” The trial judge in his general charge to the jury said: “Now, as to the promise of marriage, that is the second element. First, I instruct you that the promise must be unconditional; that is, there must be no condition attached to the promise. Now, to illustrate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baker v. N. & S. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Horne v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Parks v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- McInnis v. McRaeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Savage v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.