Legal Opinion

State v. . Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

The defendant, in writing and in apt time, requested the following instruction, to wit: “The court instructs the jury that to convict the defendant it is encumbent upon the State to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the promise to marry was absolute and not conditional upon his securing a divorce or any other condition.” The trial judge in his general charge to the jury said: “Now, as to the promise of marriage, that is the second element. First, I instruct you that the promise must be unconditional; that is, there must be no condition attached to the promise. Now, to illustrate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. N. & S. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Horne v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Parks v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. McInnis v. McRaeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Savage v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API