Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Western Carolina Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating tbe case: Tbe defendant earnestly contends tbat if tbe false and fraudulent representations charged against its agent were made by bim, be was acting beyond tbe scope of bis authority, without tbe knowledge, consent or contrivance of tbe defendant, and contrary to tbe published rules under which tbe contest was being conducted, and tbat all this was done witb tbe full knowledge of both plaintiff and defendant’s agent, for which reason, defendant says, tbe plaintiff ought not to be permitted to maintain this action.

In reply to this position, it would seem to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Starkweather v. . GravelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Munday v. . WhissenhuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Gladstone v. . SwaimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. In Re the Receivership of Port Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API