Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Gill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The Bank’s Assignments of Error Numbers 9 to 14, inclusive, are directed to the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the action against the defendant Parham, individually. These assignments are not brought forward in the Bank’s brief, no argument is made and no authorities are cited therein with reference thereto. They are, therefore, deemed abandoned, and, no error appearing on the face of the record concerning it, that judgment is affirmed. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Capune v. Robbins, 273 N.C. 581, 590, 160 S.E. 2d 881; Mathis v. Siskin, 268 N.C.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Fast v. GulleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Collins v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- C.C. Walker Grading & Hauling, Inc. v. S.R.F. Management Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- High v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.