Legal Opinion
Colorado Development Co. v. Creer
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1938No. 5949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
Mandamus was granted directing the defendants James M. Creer, Carl 0. Nelson and Flint C. Dixon to levy an assessment against the lands within Utah County Drainage District No. 4. The assessment directed to be levied was for the purpose of paying a judgment theretofore rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the Drainage District.
The petition for the writ of mandamus alleges the corporate capacity of the Colorado Development Company; that the Utah County Drainage District No. 4 is a duly organized Drainage District and that James M. Creer, Carl 0. Nelson and Flint C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Shea v. CockingMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- I. X. L. Stores Co. v. MoonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Tooele County v. De La MareUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nelson v. West Virginia Public Employees Insurance BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Hess Construction Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Home Indemnity Co. v. City of MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Rose v. Plymouth TownUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. Board of Education of City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.