Legal Opinion

Rose v. Plymouth Town

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1946No. 6924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

Proceeding in mandamus brought against the defendants, the town of Plymouth and its officials hereinafter called the town, to compel the defendants to extend the water mains of the town to the plaintiff’s residence located within the town limits, and supply him with water. The district court denied the writ, and the matter comes before us on appeal.

The town, located in Box Elder County, was incorporated for the purpose of obtaining a federal loan, via a public works authority project, to build a culinary water system. After incorporation the town approved two bond issues…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lukrawka v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Greenwood v. ProvineMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lawrence v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  4. Colorado Development Co. v. CreerUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hogs R US v. Town of FairfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rounds v. BD. OF WATER & SEWER COMMR. OF WILMINGTONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Platt v. Town of TorreyUtah Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API