Legal Opinion

Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Morris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1929No. 28,382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus prosecuted by the plaintiff, the holder of $5,000 in seven municipal temporary notes issued by the defendant under the last provision of section 24-621 of the Revised Statutes, to compel the defendants to levy a tax to pay the cost and expenses of the incorporation of defendant district and to pay for work done.

The defendants have filed a combined demurrer, motion to quash, and answer, all of which are submitted as a motion to quash the alternative writ, on the ground that it does not state facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Bobbett v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Quincy v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colorado Development Co. v. CreerUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. McCall v. GoodeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Arvidson v. Board of County CommissionersAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  5. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API