Legal Opinion
Hess Construction Co. v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 17, 1996No. 37PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
Maryland Rules, Chapter 1100, “Special Proceedings,” Subtitle BE, “Mandamus,” Rule BE44, “Damages,” provides:
*158“In an action brought pursuant to this Subtitle, the plaintiff shall have the right to claim and prove his damages, if any, and the court, in entering judgment that the writ of mandamus shall issue, may also award such damages to the plaintiff as he shall have proven.”
The petition for certiorari in this case presents this question: “Is the Petitioner entitled to recover attorney’s fees under Rule BE-44 or in actions for mandamus generally?” The Court of Special Appeals…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Collier v. MD-Individual Practice Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Custer Channel Wing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Litz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Megonnell v. United States Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. GamacheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.