Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Gropman
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided November 27, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 16186PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 35Opinion
REESE, P. J.
I. Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below
The following statement of facts and summary of proceedings in the trial court are excerpted from the engrossed settled statement filed herein:
“Testimony at Trial: Only two (2) witnesses provided testimony at time of trial, both of whom were called by plaintiff, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (‘Hartford’)—Helen Gropman, the defendant in this action, and John Rath, the assistant regional claims writing manager for plaintiff, Hartford.
“Helen Gropman: Helen Gropman testified that she and her husband purchased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Block v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Zubia v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Chong v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. GropmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.