Legal Opinion

Block v. California Physicians' Service

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1966No. Civ. 29594PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

In an action for declaratory relief plaintiff sought a declaration by the court that a clause entitled “Part Seven, C. Acts op Third Parties,” contained in a Group Health Service agreement- issued by defendant California Physicians’ Service, and an order of payment signed by him thereunder are illegal and void as against public policy, and that the sum of $1,714.34 held in trust by his counsel, Everett E. Demler, belongs to him. Defendant cross-complained for declaratory relief, breach of contract and money had and received. The cause was submitted to the trial judge on a stipulation of fact.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bilyeu v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Peller v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Mills v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Acosta v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API