Legal Opinion

Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1993No. Docket Nos. A055730, A057515PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

The Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., the Permanente Medical Group, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (hereafter Health Plan or Kaiser) appeal a judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court requiring extensive changes in the third party liability provision in service agreements with members. The theories alleged in the original complaint, filed by the plaintiff, Arthur Bradley Samura, on November 20, 1985, were greatly expanded in a first amended complaint filed about three and one-half years later. This amended complaint states a multifaceted legal challenge to the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. California Medical Ass'n v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API