Legal Opinion

Quinn v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1975No. S.F. 23146PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Under the workers’ compensation statutes1 a worker may not sue his employer for a work-related injury, but he may recover a judgment from a negligent third party for such an injury. (§ 3852.) From this judgment an employer who has paid his employee compensation benefits may recoup the amount thus expended. (§ 3856.) We must now construe that portion of section 38562 which requires the trial court *165before reimbursing the employer in such a case as this to determine and order payment of “a reasonable attorney’s fee,”3 a fee based “upon the services rendered by the employee’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grosset v. WenaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API