Legal Opinion

Chong v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 7, 2006No. 3:05-cr-02241PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

WHELAN, District Judge.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Alternatively, Defendant moves to strike Plaintiffs class allegations. Plaintiff Kathleen Chong (“Plaintiff’) opposes. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d.l). For the reasons outlined below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motions.

I. Background

All of the facts discussed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Korman v. Walking Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Rosales v. FitFlop USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  3. Steel v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  4. 21st Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. California · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API