Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Gropman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1984No. 16186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

163 Cal.App.3d 33 (1984)

209 Cal. Rptr. 468

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

HELEN GROPMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. 16186.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

November 27, 1984.

COUNSEL

Ted R. Gropman for Defendant and Appellant.

Davis & Jacobs and Joel Drum for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

REESE, P.J. —

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The following statement of facts and summary of proceedings in the trial court are excerpted from the engrossed settled statement filed herein:

"Testimony at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Block v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Zubia v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Chong v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
  5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API