Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Krempels

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1950No. L. A. 21602PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract and from an order denying his motion to vacate the judgment. The action was brought against defendant and his wife, Pauline Krempels, but judgment was entered only against defendant and he alone appeals.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that he and defendants entered into a written agreement that for 60 days from the date of execution of the agreement plaintiff would have the exelu sive right to sell a house bus owned by defendants and that plaintiff would have the right to retain as commission…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API