Legal Opinion

Cook v. La Vina Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1934No. Civ. 5110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by respondent to recover from the appellant the sum of $5,250, payments on account of seven contracts for the sale and purchase of land. A portion of that sum, $3,500, was a credit given for respondent’s equity in a house and lot; the rest had been paid in cash. The action is based upon quantum meruit. It was alleged in the complaint and found by the court that a map which was exhibited to plaintiff, from which the description of the property sold was taken, had not been filed for record and that therefore the original contracts were void; and that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Western Hardwood Lumber Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API