Legal Opinion

Coombes v. Getz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 11, 1932No. 528PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

This is a suit brought in a California superior court by petitioner, on behalf of himself and other creditors,( to recover from respondent, a director in Getz Bros. & Company, a California corporation, the'amount of an indebtedness upon an open account for goods sold to the corporation by petitioner’s assignor. The basis of the liability sought to be enforced is found in the following provision of | 3, Art. XII, of the California Constitution of 1879:

“ The directors or trustees of corporations and joint-stock associations shall be jointly and severally liable to *440the creditors and stockholders…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hawks v. HamillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API