Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1979No. Civ. 48939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

This is an action in inverse condemnation in which appellants claim damages to their property alleging that certain acts of respondent city diminished the value of appellants’ real property. In a trial without jury the court found in favor of defendant city. Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellants owned a parcel in fee simple on the northwest comer of Franklin Avenue and Orchid Street. Beginning in 1968, defendant city began activities directed toward a public street improvement project known as Franklin-Wilcox, hereinafter, the Franklin Avenue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Spears v. Cty. of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Jones v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. State of California v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST. v. Vaquero Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Joseph M. Jackovich Revocable Trust v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API