Legal Opinion

Krause v. Rarity

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13320PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

On September 12, 1927, William Krause was killed when the automobile in which he was riding as a guest was struck by a locomotive of the defendant Railway Company. The plaintiffs are the heirs of the deceased and the defendant Rarity was the driver of the ear. A verdict was rendered against both defendants as joint tort-feasors and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants have presented separate appeals.

Central Avenue is a paved rural highway extending east and west from Del Rey to Malaga in the county of Fresno. The defendant Railway Company maintains a spur-track known as the Mattel…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API