Legal Opinion

Rattray v. Scudder

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1946No. L. A. 19512Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 Cal.2d 214 (1946)

W. S. RATTRAY, Respondent,

v.

HUBERT B. SCUDDER, as Real Estate Commissioner, etc., Appellant.

L. A. No. 19512.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 21, 1946.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, Walter L. Bowers, Assistant Attorney General, and Carl S. Kegley, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellant.

Mack, Werdel & Bianco and D. Bianco for Respondent.

Hyman & Hyman as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

By an order issued April 10, 1944, defendant revoked plaintiff's license as a real estate broker. The trial court issued a writ of mandamus commanding defendant to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API