Legal Opinion
Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 5, 1927PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The defendant insured Nellie M. Kelley against liability for damage caused by the operation of her Paige auto mobile. The policy was available to any person rightfully operating the car with her consent. While it was being operated by her husband, Patrick Kelley, rightfully and with her consent, it was in collision with the plaintiff’s car. The plaintiff brought suit against Patrick Kelley for the damage resulting from this collision and obtained a judgment therein for the sum of $247.24. Execution for that sum was issued and returned nulla bona. Thereupon this suit in chancery was brought to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Gray v. Brattleboro Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Patterson's Admr. v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Salonen v. PaanenenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.