Legal Opinion

O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 5, 1921PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs from the order of the Commissioner of Industries disallowing their claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act as dependents of E. N. Lowell, who died from injuries received, it was claimed, while in the employment of the' defendant. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

From an order of the Commissioner of Industries disallowing their claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the claimants bring this appeal. The only question certified to this Court by the commissioner, is whether on the facts found by him the claimants, or any of them, are entitled to compensation.

The facts are these, in substance: The defendant, a corporation, is extensively engaged in manufacturing sounding boards, house finish, and boxes, at factories located, respectively, at Orleans, Vermont, and-Lisbon, New Hampshire. In October, 1915, it owned a quantity of lumber…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Packett v. Moretown Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  3. Abbott v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  4. Hebard v. CutlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Lapoint v. SageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re Mid America Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1939
  5. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API