Legal Opinion
Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 22, 1990PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
407 Mass. 481 (1990)
554 N.E.2d 28
LILLIAN DARCY & another[1]
vs.
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY & another;[2] ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, third-party defendant.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.
March 8, 1990.
May 22, 1990.
Present: LIACOS, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, LYNCH, & GREANEY, JJ.
Roger A. Emanuelson (William P. Smith with him) for Royal Globe Insurance Company.
Joseph G. Abromovitz for the plaintiffs.
Peter C. Kober, for The Hartford Insurance Company, was present but did not argue.
GREANEY, J.
After trial, a judge in the Superior Court concluded that Lillian Darcy and Mary…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Mello v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Sarnafil, Inc. v. Peerless Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.