Legal Opinion
Salonen v. Paanenen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 6, 1947PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against the defendant Paanenen (hereinafter called the assured), brought this bill in equity to reach and apply the obligation of the defendant insurance company (hereinafter called the company) under a motor vehicle liability policy issued by it to the assured. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 113; c. 214, § 3 (10). The judge made voluntary findings of fact and ordered the bill dismissed. From a final decree entered pursuant to this order the plaintiff appealed. The evidence is reported.
The facts may be summarized as follows: The judgment which the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Three Sons, Inc. v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.