Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., RABINO W-ITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice. BURKE, Justice.
This appeal presents issues arising from an insurance company’s refusal to unconditionally defend its insured and the insured’s subsequent decision to settle the case.
Appellee Bayless and Roberts, Inc. (hereinafter B & R) was one of three defendants in a wrongful death action. B & R’s defense in that action was undertaken by its liability insurance carrier, appellant Continental Insurance Company, pursuant to the terms of its insurance contract. As the case proceeded to trial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Quiñones López v. Manzano PozasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.