Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
. Moulton, J.
On June 16, 1934, the plaintiff’s intestate, Walter Woodard, was severely injured in a collision with an automobile owned and operated by Roland Miller. Miller was, at the time, covered by a liability insurance policy issued by the Preferred Accident Insurance. Company of New York, the defendant herein. The policy provided that “This agreement is subject to the following conditions * * * I. Notice of accident. In the event of accident written notice shall be given by or on behalf of the Assured to the- Company or any of its authorized agents as soon as is reasonably possible…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Wolverine Insurance v. SorroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.