Legal Opinion

Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 2, 1938PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. Moulton, J.

On June 16, 1934, the plaintiff’s intestate, Walter Woodard, was severely injured in a collision with an automobile owned and operated by Roland Miller. Miller was, at the time, covered by a liability insurance policy issued by the Preferred Accident Insurance. Company of New York, the defendant herein. The policy provided that “This agreement is subject to the following conditions * * * I. Notice of accident. In the event of accident written notice shall be given by or on behalf of the Assured to the- Company or any of its authorized agents as soon as is reasonably possible…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wolverine Insurance v. SorroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API