Legal Opinion

Raithel Et Ux. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

This is a suit in chancery, and is here on claimant’s appeal from a decree for plaintiffs. The suit was brought against Hall and Hughes. It appears from the allegations of the original and amended complaint that on August 13, 1921, Hall conveyed to plaintiffs a farm and personal property in the town of Dummerston for forty-two hundred dollars, and took in part payment plaintiffs’ promissory note, of same date, for twenty-seven hundred dollars, secured by a mortgage on said farm and also by a mortgage on said personal property; that on January 17, 1923, plaintiffs brought a body action against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Waterman v. MoodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  5. McLane v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Humphreys v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  5. Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API