Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In the Interest of T.N.F.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 30, 2006No. 10-05-00327-CVPublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

After a jury trial, the parental rights of Tammy Fulton, Ray Fulton, and Brandon Wobig to their respective children were terminated. All three appeal. We will affirm.

Tammy is the mother of all four children. Ray is the biological father of two of the children: H.Ra.F. and He.R.F., William Towery, the biological father of HÍ.R.F., reached an agreement with the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services on conservatorship, and his parental rights are not at issue. Brandon is the biological father of T.N.F. All four children resided with Tammy and Ray. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. in the Interest of S.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. In the Interest of C.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. in the Interest of M.C.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. in the Interest of J.S. and A.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  5. In Re T.T., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API