In the interest of C.H.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jefferson
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice RODRIGUEZ join.
We are asked to decide the appropriate appellate standard to review the factual sufficiency of the evidence in parental termination cases, in which the burden of proof at trial is by clear and convincing evidence. We granted review to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals about whether the traditional factual sufficiency standard is adequate to review the findings in a termination proceeding, and if not, what the appropriate standard should be. We…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,894 opinions
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- In the Interest of A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Interest of H.R.M.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
2,889 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.