Legal Opinion
In the Interest of C.R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 7, 2008No. 05-07-00503-CVPublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice THOMAS.
Following a bench trial, the trial court terminated Ruby Davis’s parental rights to C.R. On appeal, Davis challenges the trial court’s judgment, contending the trial court erred in admitting Davis’s drug test results and the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s termination order. We affirm.
Background
C.R. was born to Davis and Phillip Riddle on February 3, 1998. Both Riddle and Davis used “pseudoephedrine 60” or a “controlled substance” after C.R. was born. Davis obtained the drugs from Riddle, who owned a drug…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- in the Interest of J.P.B., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- in the Interest of A.Q.W., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
- In the Interest of S.Y., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Patel v. Texas Department of Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In the Interest of C.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- A. R. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.