In the Interest of J.F.C.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Owen, joined by Chief Justice Phillips, Justice Hecht, Justice Jefferson, and Justice Smith
After a jury trial, the trial court in this case rendered a judgment terminating the rights of both the mother and father to three of their children. A divided court of appeals reversed and remanded, holding that omission of an instruction that termination must be in the children’s best interest from material parts of the jury charge was fundamental error that could be raised for the first time on appeal, and that the error probably caused rendition of an improper judgment.1 We hold that:
1) although the trial court’s charge was erroneous because it omitted the children’s best interest as a…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,845 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- in the Interest of J.P.B., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re J.O.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- In the Interest of H.R.M.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
2,840 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.