in the Interest of M.C.G., a Child

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING

LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.

Appellant moved for rehearing, contending that our opinion relied on improper evidence in affirming the termination of his parental rights to M.C.G. based on failure to provide support. 1 We overrule appellant’s motion and issue this supplemental opinion on rehearing to respond to some of his arguments.

Despite extensive references to such testimony in his appellate brief, appellant’s primary argument on rehearing is that we erred in considering testimony from prior hearings, rather than only the termination trial, in assessing the…