Legal Opinion

Drummond v. City of Columbus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1939No. 30507PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Fred Drummond, a resident taxpayer of the city of Columbus, brought an action to enjoin the city from issuing $250,000 of bonds under the revenue bond act. The trial court held there was no equity in the petition of plaintiff, nor in the cross-petitions of two interveners, and dismissed the action. Intervener Northwestern Public Service Company has appealed, and intervener William H. Henggeler has prosecuted a cross-appeal.

Plaintiff’s petition against the city, its mayor, and the members of the city council alleged that Columbus was a city of the first class, and that on July 22, 1936, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Leavenworth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Denver v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Consumers Public Power District v. EldredNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Munch v. TusaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Baird v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Inslee v. City of BridgeportNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API