Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Tollefsen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoweer, J.

The only provisions of the policy in suit deemed by the parties material to the appeal are the coverage clause insuring the defendants “C. D. Brower, Jr. and/or the Sturgeon Bay Company,” as the “named assured,” and the exclusion clauses exempting from coverage, (1) “any accident to any employee or employees of the assured arising out of and in the usual course of . . . the business ... of the assured,” and (2) “any obligation assumed by or imposed upon the assured under any workmen’s compensation agreement, plan or law.” We must assume, in addition, that the policy contains the provisions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernard v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Michigan Public Service Co. v. City of CheboyganMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hanson v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API