Munch v. Tusa
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.*
This is an injunction proceeding to enjoin the election commissioner of Douglas county and other defendants from placing upon the ballot at the election held November 5, 1940, a proposal to amend the home rule charter of the city of Omaha.
Plaintiff alleges: Since 1909 the statutes of Nebraska have provided for a police relief and pension fund arid have designated the sources of revenue to maintain the fund. Laws 1909, ch. 15. The present law has been in effect since 1921. Laws 1921, ch. 116, art. V, sec. 10 et seq. The law is pursuant to statute and is a part of the home rule…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Omaha Parking Authority v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Lickert v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Christensen v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Arizona Together v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Noble v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.