Legal Opinion

City of Leavenworth v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1904No. 13,564PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Error from Leavenworth district court; J. H. Gillpatrick, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*75The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J. :

A resident taxpayer of the city of Leavenworth secured an injunction restraining the municipality from issuing water-works bonds in the sum of $400,000, under sections 8, 10, 11 and 12 of chapter 82, Laws of 1897, and section 9 of that chapter as amended by section 1 of chapter 107 of the Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§660-664). At the time the injunction proceedings were commenced an election had been held, at which a proposition to vote the bonds had carried, but the securities had not been issued. The election proclamation stated the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Commissioners of Bourbon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. McBryde v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Truelsen v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. State v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. North v. Platte CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Drummond v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Kansas Electric Power Co. v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API