Legal Opinion
Tiller v. Amerada Hess Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 12, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-1652-3, 81-1653-3, 81-1752-3 and 81-1753-3PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GEORGE ROSS ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the above-styled cases, operating service stations for the Defendant, Amerada Hess Corporation [Hess], bring this suit under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act [P.M.P.A.] of 1978, 15 U.S.C. § 2801, et. seq. The cases were consolidated for the purposes of a preliminary injunction hearing which was held before me on October 13th and 14th, 1981. The factual basis for the injunctive relief is not in dispute. The Plaintiffs’ Complaints and their Motions for a Preliminary Injunction are based upon a letter which Hess delivered to each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Saad v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Pearman v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Don Roberts v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Cason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Valentine v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
- Radecki v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.