Legal Opinion

Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1979No. Civ. 6-78-290PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff herein is a “jobber” or franchisee for defendant Amoco Oil Company in the Moorhead, Minnesota area. This action was commenced in July of 1978, and is based on Amoco’s refusal to sell plaintiff tires, batteries, and accessories for resale to plaintiff’s customers, allegedly in violation of the parties’ franchise agreement. During discovery Amoco discovered that plaintiff in the past has purchased non-Amoco oil products and resold them under the Amoco label. Upon learning this, Amoco immediately informed plaintiff that it was terminating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fennell v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. Marvin Frejlach, D/B/A the Payne Reliever v. Rosalie Butler, Individually and in Her Capacity as Councilperson of the City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Saad v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  4. Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  3. Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Anne Cara Oil Co. (In Re Anne Cara Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
  5. Beermart, Inc. v. The Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API