Legal Opinion

Don Roberts v. Amoco Oil Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1984No. 83-2329PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Don Roberts, an Amoco service station franchisee, appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment for Amoco Oil Company. The question posed is whether an offer by a franchisor to sell its service station premises excluding the gasoline pumps, dispensers, storage tanks, piping, or other equipment constitutes a “bona fide offer” under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. We hold that such an offer is not “bona fide” as a matter of law, and reverse and remand.

I

We begin by outlining the facts. Because the case comes to us from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
  3. Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  4. Palmieri v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
  5. Joseph Palmieri v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Ellis v. Mobil OilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Howard Lugar v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Cason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API