Legal Opinion
Radecki v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1986No. Civ. 3-83-487PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki’s Service, Inc. (collectively referred to as Radecki) commenced this lawsuit against defendant Amoco Oil Company (Amoco) under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806, on April 20, 1983. Radecki is a franchisee of Amoco and operates a traditional full-service retail Amoco station at 1099 Grand Avenue in St. Paul, Minnesota. A traditional full-service station is a station which sells not only gasoline, but also provides repair and towing services and sells tires, batteries, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Baldauf v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Don Roberts v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Estate of Cartwright v. City of Concord, Cal.District Court, N.D. California · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keener v. Exxon Co. USACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Keener v. Exxon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Strasheim v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987