Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-816PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEYOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Charles A. Meyer, instituted this action against Amerada Hess Corporation seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and damages on account of a new gasoline station Dealer Agreement which Hess required that he execute in August, 1981. The First Count of the complaint seeks relief under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act of 1978, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (the “PMPA”). The Second Count seeks relief under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, N.J.S.A. 56:10-1 et seq. The Third and Fourth Counts allege state common law claims.
Plaintiff applied for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Henry Hughes v. Local No. 11 of International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst Enterprises, Inc., Richard H. Ernst and Eunice R. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Don Roberts v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.